Subject: Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
From: Christopher C. Chimelis (chris@debian.org)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 06:45:54 PDT
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> No we won't, binaries compiled on potato will run just fine with the new
> glibc/db setup.
Ok..if you say so...
> You probably are. Also not that in this case the upload was for both
> potato and woody, which makes the point moot.
I noticed that. Nevermind...
> You could have just compiled it once for potato and uploaded it to both
> like everyone else is doing. That's a much cleaner solution then doing
> a useless recompile that you seem to insist on doing.
Like I said, nevermind...I'm only doing it this way because my net access
was a bit sporadic last night and wasn't able to connect to faure for
awhile. I'm not going to argue about it since it's not worth it...
C
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Thu Nov 02 2000 - 08:06:30 PST