Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]

Subject: Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
From: Christopher C. Chimelis (chris@debian.org)
Date: Sat Oct 07 2000 - 22:21:22 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Robert Martinovic: "X4.0.1 woes"
Previous message: Wichert Akkerman: "[jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]"
In reply to: Wichert Akkerman: "[jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]"
Next in thread: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]"
Reply: Christopher C. Chimelis: "Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]"

On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Looks like somebody messed up badly.. can someone do a binary-only NMU?

Ugh...not again. Can we make updates a distinct version so I don't
compile them on a woody system?

Speaking of which, I don't even have a potato system at this
point...what's the status of the Debian-hosted alphas?

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Thu Nov 02 2000 - 08:06:30 PST