Subject: Re: 2.2.12 vs 2.2.13
From: Ron Farrer (rbf@toxic.magnesium.net)
Date: Wed Oct 20 1999 - 18:24:27 PDT
Bart Warmerdam (bartw@xs4all.nl) wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> I ran 2.2.12 for some time now and switched to 2.2.13 this afternoon. It's
> not a very reliable answer if I tell you that 2.2.13 works for me,
> considering the uptime, but it works well.
>
> 2.2.12 clean has some mem-leak issues I heard. There is a patch available
> somewhere to address this.
Well... I'm now running 2.2.13. So far so good. Now we'll have to see how well it stays up! ;-)
Later,
Ron
-- ========================= = Ronald Burnett Farrer = ========================= ------------------------------------ - "mailto:rbf@magnesium.net" - - "http://www.magnesium.net/~rbf/" - ------------------------------------ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! If you let Windows dominate, expect the worst: ! ! "WORLD.SYS is corrupt, reboot UNIVERSE Y/n" ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? "How could this [Y2K Bug] be a problem in a country ? ? where we have Intel and Microsoft?" -- Al Gore ? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Thu Nov 04 1999 - 16:56:58 PST