Subject: Re: broke potato, missing unmet
From: Christopher C Chimelis (chris@debian.org)
Date: Mon Oct 11 1999 - 11:37:59 PDT
On 11 Oct 1999, Ron Farrer wrote:
> I seem to be missing unmet... I'm trying to fully upgrade to potato to fix
> a problem with X11 and I keep getting stuck with a few packages that wont
> upgrade because they require Unmet?!?
>
> # apt-get install unmet
> <SNIP>
> <bunch of unaligned traps...>
> E: Couldn't find package Unmet
>
> Ideas?
Could it be saying that dependencies are "unmet" meaning not met? If you
can, please send a log of "apt-get upgrade" and maybe I can figure it out.
I've done three slink->potato upgrades so far and may know the problems
already.
As for the unaligned traps, I'm due to look into those shortly. There's
some unaligned accesses going on in the C++ startup code (which was
*supposed* to be 64-bit clean). If someone wants to look for the problem,
be my guest (I've got a nasty binutils bug to look at and fix first).
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Thu Nov 04 1999 - 16:56:57 PST