Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)

Subject: Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)
From: Christopher C. Chimelis (chris@debian.org)
Date: Mon May 08 2000 - 15:49:50 PDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: J.A. Bezemer: "Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• Previous message: J.A. Bezemer: "ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• In reply to: J.A. Bezemer: "ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• Next in thread: J.A. Bezemer: "Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• Reply: Christopher C. Chimelis: "Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"

On Tue, 9 May 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:

> (Oh, we're indeed still waiting for static apt & dpkg to go in upgrade-alpha.
> See my earlier message to the list.)

I'm going to try to get to work on this tonight or tomorrow at the
latest....

C

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

• Next message: J.A. Bezemer: "Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• Previous message: J.A. Bezemer: "ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• In reply to: J.A. Bezemer: "ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• Next in thread: J.A. Bezemer: "Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"
• Reply: Christopher C. Chimelis: "Re: ldso fixed? (was Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Thu Jun 01 2000 - 09:46:26 PDT