Re: gcc

Subject: Re: gcc
From: Christopher C. Chimelis (chris@debian.org)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2000 - 10:13:24 PST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: tad@omoikane.co.jp: "Re: Bug#59893: building ELK on alpha failed"
• Previous message: David Huggins-Daines: "Re: UP1000 M/B"
• In reply to: John Goerzen: "gcc"
• Next in thread: John Goerzen: "Re: gcc"
• Reply: Christopher C. Chimelis: "Re: gcc"

On 10 Mar 2000, John Goerzen wrote:

> FYI, the Alpha autobuilder just built gcc. Should I upload this (has
> it been tested) or will one of you go ahead and compile and upload it?

Go ahead and upload it for woody. I've gotten the potato compile uploaded
already (-7), but held off on the woody compile for now. It compiled ok
and should be alright to autobuild this time around (although I still
think we should be compiling this and glibc by hand in the future for
obvious reasons).

C

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

• Next message: tad@omoikane.co.jp: "Re: Bug#59893: building ELK on alpha failed"
• Previous message: David Huggins-Daines: "Re: UP1000 M/B"
• In reply to: John Goerzen: "gcc"
• Next in thread: John Goerzen: "Re: gcc"
• Reply: Christopher C. Chimelis: "Re: gcc"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Sat Apr 01 2000 - 04:15:02 PST