Subject: Re: getting troubles compiling kernel 2.4.0test3 with debian 2.2
From: Christopher C. Chimelis (chris@debian.org)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 08:11:22 PDT
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Stefano Curtarolo wrote:
> Ok, I am waiting !!
Ok...here it is. Again, the i386-centric folk decided not to change
things for all archs...what else is new, right? :-)
At any rate, this should be it. I haven't compiled it yet, but it should
be ok now. I have NO idea if this will actually work, but if it does on
i386, then it should here too :-) This is the complete diff, btw, so it
supercedes the other one that I sent.
C
diff -ruN linux-2.4.0-test3/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c linux-patched/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c
--- linux-2.4.0-test3/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c Mon Apr 24 16:39:34 2000
+++ linux-patched/arch/alpha/kernel/time.c Thu Jul 13 11:00:46 2000
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
#include "irq_impl.h"
extern rwlock_t xtime_lock;
-extern volatile unsigned long lost_ticks; /* kernel/sched.c */
+extern unsigned long wall_jiffies;
static int set_rtc_mmss(unsigned long);
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
sec = xtime.tv_sec;
usec = xtime.tv_usec;
partial_tick = state.partial_tick;
- lost = lost_ticks;
+ lost = jiffies - wall_jiffies;
read_unlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
@@ -363,12 +363,12 @@
time. Without this, a full-tick error is possible. */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- delta_usec = lost_ticks * (1000000 / HZ);
+ delta_usec = (jiffies - wall_jiffies) * (1000000 / HZ);
#else
delta_usec = rpcc() - state.last_time;
delta_usec = (delta_usec * state.scaled_ticks_per_cycle
+ state.partial_tick
- + (lost_ticks << FIX_SHIFT)) * 15625;
+ + ((jiffies - wall_jiffies) << FIX_SHIFT)) * 15625;
delta_usec = ((delta_usec / ((1UL << (FIX_SHIFT-6-1)) * HZ)) + 1) / 2;
#endif
diff -ruN linux-2.4.0-test3/drivers/block/md.c linux-patched/drivers/block/md.c
--- linux-2.4.0-test3/drivers/block/md.c Fri Jul 7 18:53:58 2000
+++ linux-patched/drivers/block/md.c Thu Jul 13 10:26:50 2000
@@ -2908,7 +2908,7 @@
* many dirty RAID5 blocks.
*/
current->policy = SCHED_OTHER;
- current->priority = 40;
+ current->nice = 40;
// md_unlock_kernel();
up(thread->sem);
@@ -3336,7 +3336,7 @@
/*
* Resync has low priority.
*/
- current->priority = 1;
+ current->nice = 1;
is_mddev_idle(mddev); /* this also initializes IO event counters */
for (m = 0; m < SYNC_MARKS; m++) {
@@ -3412,7 +3412,7 @@
currspeed = (j-mddev->resync_mark_cnt)/((jiffies-mddev->resync_mark)/HZ +1) +1;
if (currspeed > sysctl_speed_limit_min) {
- current->priority = 1;
+ current->nice = 1;
if ((currspeed > sysctl_speed_limit_max) ||
!is_mddev_idle(mddev)) {
@@ -3422,7 +3422,7 @@
goto repeat;
}
} else
- current->priority = 40;
+ current->nice = 40;
}
fsync_dev(read_disk);
printk(KERN_INFO "md: md%d: sync done.\n",mdidx(mddev));
diff -ruN linux-2.4.0-test3/kernel/timer.c linux-patched/kernel/timer.c
--- linux-2.4.0-test3/kernel/timer.c Mon Jul 10 17:35:19 2000
+++ linux-patched/kernel/timer.c Thu Jul 13 10:26:50 2000
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@
p->counter = 0;
p->need_resched = 1;
}
- if (p->priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (p->nice < DEF_COUNTER)
kstat.cpu_nice += user_tick;
else
kstat.cpu_user += user_tick;
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Tue Aug 01 2000 - 04:53:14 PDT