Subject: Re: kernel upgrade
From: Daniel Morriss (dmorriss@projectx.com.au)
Date: Mon Aug 09 1999 - 19:38:57 PDT
Ryan Kirkpatrick wrote:
> Guess I just got lucky... What were Alan Cox's patches supposed to
> do? I didn't go for 2.2.10 because I had heard on debian-user that 2.2.10
> had a filesystem corruption bug. Oh, the fun of new stable kernels and
> trying to figure out which one is best. :)
FWIW, i've been running 2.2.10 on an XL-266 for about 4
weeks now with no apparent corruption, and no problem with
large compiles. The clock does creep forward a little bit,
but that's about it. I haven't had any trouble compiling
2.2.10 under 2.2.10 anyway.
Then again it has slink installed, and not potato...
-- Daniel Morriss System Administrator Project X Internet-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a22 : Tue Sep 07 1999 - 16:15:06 PDT