Thank you for your input, I did not think 3.0 would bring lots of performance improvement
(They so much work to get it right, did not think they'd get it fast!)
With .deb packges availables, I' trying them now. (10 secs of install vs 2 hours !)
regards,
Bernard
jeff.sturm@appnet.com on 16/05/2001 20:14:00
Pour: axp-list@redhat.com@hub
cc: (ccc : Bernard HUGUENEY/IMA/DER/EDFGDF/FR)
Objet: Re: Réf. : AlphaLinux: The Penguin Drives a Ferrari
Bernard HUGUENEY wrote:
> Very intersting read ! I'm depressed by the poor egcs performance. Does
anybody
> knows if gcc 2.95.4 is any better ?
There is no such release as 2.95.4. You might be thinking of 2.95.3, which is
basically 2.95 + bugfixes.
3.0 will generally be better than its predecessors (especially egcs) even
though
it is not considered a performance release. BTW the current hopeful thinking
is
that 3.0 will be released sometime in June.
> But template and inlining are different
> kind of optimizations from fpu managment so I was wondering if it would
still be
> woth it.
3.0 has many, many improvements for C++. Consider giving it a try along with
ccc.
-- Jeff Sturm jeff.sturm@commerceone.com_______________________________________________ Axp-list mailing list Axp-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
_______________________________________________ Axp-list mailing list Axp-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
This archive was generated by hypermail version 2a22 on Fri Jun 1 04:36:14 2001 PDT
Send any problems or questions about this archive to webmaster@alphalinux.org.