Re: disparities in hardware?


Maurice Hilarius (maurice@harddata.com)
Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:03:03 -0700


With regards to your message at 05:52 PM 12-29-98 -0500, Ari Jort. Where
you stated:
>
>
>A general question from someone who does not know
>very much about hardware or about alphas:
>
>Why do there seem to be such great disparities
>in software support among the various alpha platforms?
>Are there historical reasons? Do similar issues
>exist for NT/Alpha? How about other chips?
>
>It seems there are many more complications getting software
>for one particular alpha as opposed to another than for
>the various intel chips and their clones; even chips made
>by other companies. All the varieties of Alphas are actually
>made by Digital, right?
>
>
>Thanks for any enlightenment,
I think it can be summed up most easily this way:
Many of the users on this list have Alpha machines made as long ago as 1993.
Some of the models were very proprietary Digital designs.
There are really 5 distinct Alpha chip main variants in use ( 6 if you
include the about-to-ship 21264).

So, the machines we discuss on this list vary _quite_ a bit!

It is about the same as if you had an Intel list with people using 286's,
PS/2 machines, Tandy computers, 386, 486, and modern machines.

Best regards,

  Maurice W. Hilarius Telephone: 01-403-414-9319
  Hard Data Ltd. FAX: 01-403-456-1510
  11060 - 166 Avenue email:maurice@harddata.com
  Edmonton, AB, Canada - T5X 1Y3 http://www.harddata.com

  NOTE: January 25, 1999, new telephone numbers _AND_ area code:
                                        Telephone: 01-780-456-9771
                                        FAX: 01-780-456-9772

-- 
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Jan 24 1999 - 14:47:45 PST