Axp-List Archive
Re: alpha update for 2.3.47-6

Subject: Re: alpha update for 2.3.47-6
From: Richard Henderson (rth@twiddle.net)
Date: Sun Feb 20 13:19:13 2000


On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:49:28PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> A noop is different than nothing. Also flush_page_to_ram is a noop, but we
> have to define it to be a noop to be right.

flush_page_to_ram I understand -- it is trying to compensate for
systems without coherent dma. If I have coherent dma, I don't
need to do anything.

hw_resend_irq I don't understand. All I see is one implementation
that uses hw to re-send an interrupt to either the local cpu or
to the system (it is not immediately obvious which). The sole
comment I find about IRQ_REPLAY is "when Linux resends an IRQ
that was dropped earlier". But unlike x86, we have no method
to resend, and it certainly appears that a noop would not accomplish
what the code expects.

Please enlighten me.

r~

-- 
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com



This archive was generated by hypermail version 2a22 on Wed Mar 1 06:26:24 2000 PST
Send any problems or questions about this archive to webmaster@alphalinux.org.