Re: UDB and modem

Maurice W. Hilarius (harddata@bigfoot.com)
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 17:41:34 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mika Kortelainen: "Re: Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"
Previous message: Tom Linden: "Re: Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"

With regards to your message at 07:12 PM 11-26-97 -0500, Brian Wood. Where
you stated:
>Maurice W. Hilarius wrote:
>
>> Yes, very true, but you can get a license for a noname ( AXPpic33) which is
>> chipset and functionally identical, and is certified for UNIX.
>> While not a perfect solution, it has worked for many people.
>
>Not to belabor the point, but aren't DU licenses CPU-specific? Wopuldn't
>this still make it illegal to run on a UDB unless covered by a site
>license?
Technically yes. But when I needed some from DEC, I described what I was
doing, and they were most co-operative. Bottom lien: I told them. They sold
me some licenses.
Another note: Site licenses do not cover the basic per-CPU license. They
cover PAKs, for other services and software, but not the basic CPUbase and
2 user license.

Cheers,

+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Maurice Hilarius | The Past is History |
| | The Future is Mystery |
| | Today is a Gift |
| Phone/FAX (403) 456-1510 | That is why they call it |
| email:harddata@bigfoot.com | The Present |
+--------------------------------------------------------+

-- 
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com

Next message: Mika Kortelainen: "Re: Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"
Previous message: Tom Linden: "Re: Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"