Re: UDB and modem

Brian Wood (beww@intac.com)
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 19:12:58 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dave Wreski: "RE: Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"
Previous message: richardh@towertechnology.com.au: "Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"
Maybe in reply to: Roman Martonak: "UDB and modem"

Maurice W. Hilarius wrote:

> Yes, very true, but you can get a license for a noname ( AXPpic33) which is
> chipset and functionally identical, and is certified for UNIX.
> While not a perfect solution, it has worked for many people.

Not to belabor the point, but aren't DU licenses CPU-specific? Wopuldn't
this still make it illegal to run on a UDB unless covered by a site
license?

> Netscape on em86 is still the easiest path, but a bit on the slow side on
> a UDB166 machine.

Agreed.

-- Brian E.W. Wood - beww@intac.com - Conserve Bandwidth, use one-line sigs !

-- 
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com

Next message: Dave Wreski: "RE: Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"
Previous message: richardh@towertechnology.com.au: "Ram - EDO SDRAM ????"
Maybe in reply to: Roman Martonak: "UDB and modem"