Re: Can't get my PC164 to boot

Jim Paradis (paradis@amt.tay1.dec.com)
Wed, 27 Nov 1996 13:00:43 -0500 (EST)

> Is it really the PALcode that is at fault, or is it that Milo and SRM
> initialize the interrupt controller differently? I was under the impression
> that Milo actually contains and uses the SRM PALcode, but perhaps I'm
> mistaken.

No, it is the PALcode that's different. MILO does *not* contain the SRM
PALcode; it contains a modified version of the evaluation board PALcode
which is not the same at all. The MILO PAL may be more "SRM-like" in
that it implements the same CALL_PAL entry points and the same memory
management scheme, but it implements interrupts differently and it is
quite different internally.

That is one of the reasons why one of the config options is
"Use SRM as bootloader?"...

-- 
Jim Paradis (paradis@amt.tay1.dec.com)        "It's not procrastination, 
Digital Equipment Corporation		       it's my new Just-In-Time 
(508)952-4047				       Workload Management System!"
http://www.tiac.net/users/jrp/index.html

--
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com



Feedback | Store | News | Support | Product Errata | About Us | Linux Info | Search | JumpWords
No Frames | Show Frames

Copyright © 1995-1997 Red Hat Software. Legal notices