Re: using linux instead of osf
Michal Jaegermann (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:58:29 -0700 (MST)
> > David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> > [ Answering the following: ]
> > Naively, one would expect that, to compute the sine of some
> > argument in single precision would require *less* fp operations than
> > to get it correct up to double precision.
> You have a good point here.
> The algorithm per se is the same. I don't
> recall off-hand how many bits of precisions you get with each step in
> a Taylor series, but it seems to me that you should be able to save
> one or two steps when using single-precision.
Ugh! I do hope that these routines do not use Taylor expansions
to compute elementary functions. If yes, then no wonder that DEC
library is so much faster. I do not have right now neither hardware
nor sources, but in general Taylor expansions converge very slowly.
There are better ways to compute such things.
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to email@example.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject. Do not send it to firstname.lastname@example.org
Product Errata |
About Us |
Linux Info |
No Frames |
Copyright © 1995-1997 Red Hat Software. Legal notices