Re: compiling xli

Richard Henderson (richard@atheist.tamu.edu)
Mon, 4 Nov 1996 19:00:47 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eric Jones: "SHADOW and axp"
Previous message: Harald Koenig: "Re: S3 Chip with X"
In reply to: Mihaly HOMONNAI: "Re: Winnt question"
Next in thread: David A Rusling: "Re: Winnt question"

> But gcc 2.7.0 compiled the same sources without errors. There has to have
> changed something in gcc that is toggled by xli.

There were *lots* of changes between 2.7.0 and 2.7.2. Mostly for
the better, as 2.7.0 is more or less abysmal as far as optimisation
goes, but there we are.

> Is someone willing to forward this to the gcc-axp maintainers? I think this
> is a bug and not a feature.

If you would, please follow the directions in the gcc documentation
for reporting bugs. And if you'll cc the report to me (I don't read
the gcc-bugs list often), I'll look at it as soon as I can.

--
To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com

Next message: Eric Jones: "SHADOW and axp"
Previous message: Harald Koenig: "Re: S3 Chip with X"
In reply to: Mihaly HOMONNAI: "Re: Winnt question"
Next in thread: David A Rusling: "Re: Winnt question"