Re: a 21164 oddity

Richard Henderson (richard@atheist.tamu.edu)
Tue, 20 Feb 1996 19:46:00 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Neal.: "Yes, 21164 versions *are* documented."
Previous message: Erik Troan: "Re: a 21164 oddity"
In reply to: Neal.: "a 21164 oddity"

crook@rdgeng.enet.dec.com wrote:
> Yes, there are some memory-management features that get zapped, leading
> to 2 versions of the chip. One will run Digital Unix and OpenVMS and
> Windows NT and Linux. The other will run Windows NT and Linux and its
> behaviour if you try to run Digital Unix or OpenVMS is INDETERMINATE.

Is anything more specific available here? While it may run Linux
fine right now, it'd be nice to know what to look out for as the
system is optimized.

Next message: Neal.: "Yes, 21164 versions *are* documented."
Previous message: Erik Troan: "Re: a 21164 oddity"
In reply to: Neal.: "a 21164 oddity"