> The reason for doing this is solely marketing-driven, and all Linux
> fans should be glad because it will allow Digital to pick a lower
> price-point for chips.
> Note that the 'crippled' chip will *not* run the SRM console, and so
> you will need to use Milo standalone or Milo via ARC to get the system
> running.
As long as it's capable of running Linux, most people probably won't
have a problem with this, if it means cheaper machines. However, is
this different behavior *documented* someplace? I'd really hate
spending hours debugging something that just doesn't work according to
specs. If the hw ref manuals are accurate all is fine. Otherwise, I
might just as well buy an x86. Intel has a real good history of not
documenting chip features (at least not without NDA). I hope Digital
is not following the same path.
--david
Copyright © 1995-1997 Red Hat Software. Legal notices