Re: Shared libs

David Mosberger-Tang (davidm@AZStarNet.com)
Fri, 16 Feb 1996 11:01:55 -0700

>>>>> On Fri, 16 Feb 1996 12:46:44 -0500, Noah Lee Gibbs <noah@trout.res.cmu.edu> said:

Noah> Is there a timetable yet for shared libraries working?
Noah> Is there a better place to ask this question? I've checked
Noah> the FAQ, but many features, including shared libraries, just
Noah> aren't mentioned.

To quote from the FAQ:

1. What State Is Linux/Alpha In?

Pretty much everything is up and running: there is now XFree86, LaTeX,
ghostview, Mosaic, Emacs, gcc, NFS, automounter, all sorts of shells,
perl, python, Tcl/Tk, scheme, apache HTTP server, and pretty much
anything else that's freely available. X11 works well on several
video cards (see below). The only thing that is still dearly missing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
is a GNU ld that can produce shared libraries and a freely available
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
dynamic loader. Besides that, performance tuning is probably the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
biggest remaining junk of work. In particular libc and libm need more
code optimized specifically for the Alpha architecture.

At to a timetable: we are waiting for DEC to finalize their Alpha ELF
standard so that Linux can be compatible with it. Latest I heard is
that this is going to happen RSN. Anybody have an update on this?

I don't believe anybody is currently pursuing a free implementation of
ECOFF shared libraries.

--david



Feedback | Store | News | Support | Product Errata | About Us | Linux Info | Search | JumpWords
No Frames | Show Frames

Copyright © 1995-1997 Red Hat Software. Legal notices